Journal of Clinical Epidemiology

1

Oncology employees valued patient-oriented research over quality of work-life research: a qualitative study

Joanna E.M. Sale

Journal:

Year:

2008

Language:

english

File:

PDF, 93 KB

english, 2008

2

Self-reported information on the diagnosis of colorectal cancer was reliable but not necessarily valid

Brigid M. Lynch, Danny Youlden, Lin Fritschi, Beth Newman, Kenneth I. Pakenham, Barbara Leggett, Neville Owen, Joanne F. Aitken

Journal:

Journal of Clinical Epidemiology

Year:

2008

Language:

english

File:

PDF, 262 KB

english, 2008

3

A parametric analysis of ordinal quality-of-life data can lead to erroneous results

Elke Kahler, Anja Rogausch, Edgar Brunner, Wolfgang Himmel

Journal:

Journal of Clinical Epidemiology

Year:

2008

Language:

english

File:

PDF, 308 KB

english, 2008

4

Tragedy of conducting a clinical trial; generic alert system needed

I. Montfoort, M.A. Frens, B.W. Koes, G.C. Lagers-van Haselen, C.I. de Zeeuw, A.P. Verhagen

Journal:

Journal of Clinical Epidemiology

Year:

2008

Language:

english

File:

PDF, 96 KB

english, 2008

5

Poor reporting and inadequate searches were apparent in systematic reviews of adverse effects

Su Golder, Yoon Loke, Heather M. McIntosh

Journal:

Journal of Clinical Epidemiology

Year:

2008

Language:

english

File:

PDF, 169 KB

english, 2008

6

Adjusted indirect comparison may be less biased than direct comparison for evaluating new pharmaceutical interventions

F. Song, I. Harvey, R. Lilford

Journal:

Journal of Clinical Epidemiology

Year:

2008

Language:

english

File:

PDF, 278 KB

english, 2008

7

Lysholm scale and WOMAC index were responsive in prospective cohort of young general practice patients

E.M. Heintjes, S.M.A. Bierma-Zeinstra, M.Y. Berger, B.W. Koes

Journal:

Journal of Clinical Epidemiology

Year:

2008

Language:

english

File:

PDF, 170 KB

english, 2008

8

Qualiveen, a urinary-disorder specific instrument: 0.5 corresponds to the minimal important difference

Véronique Bonniaud, Dianne Bryant, Bernard Parratte, Gordon Guyatt

Journal:

Journal of Clinical Epidemiology

Year:

2008

Language:

english

File:

PDF, 134 KB

english, 2008

9

The Short-Form Chronic Respiratory Disease Questionnaire was a Valid, Reliable, and Responsive Quality-of-Life Instrument in Acute Exacerbations of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease

Chu-Lin Tsai, Richard V. Hodder, John H. Page, Rita K. Cydulka, Brian H. Rowe, Carlos A. Camargo Jr.

Journal:

Journal of Clinical Epidemiology

Year:

2008

Language:

english

File:

PDF, 231 KB

english, 2008

10

Comorbidity information in older patients at an emergency visit: self-report vs. administrative data had poor agreement but similar predictive validity

Stephanie R. Susser, Jane McCusker, Eric Belzile

Journal:

Journal of Clinical Epidemiology

Year:

2008

Language:

english

File:

PDF, 122 KB

english, 2008

11

Studying the causes of adverse drug reactions: circumvent the warning-interfered bias using the case–case comparison approach

Ling-Yi Wang, Wen-Chung Lee

Journal:

Journal of Clinical Epidemiology

Year:

2008

Language:

english

File:

PDF, 62 KB

english, 2008

12

Maximization of the sum of sensitivity and specificity as a diagnostic cutpoint criterion

Kim Kaivanto

Journal:

Journal of Clinical Epidemiology

Year:

2008

Language:

english

File:

PDF, 62 KB

english, 2008

13

Systematic reviews and original articles differ in relevance, novelty, and use in an evidence-based service for physicians: PLUS project

R. James McKinlay, Chris Cotoi, Nancy L. Wilczynski, R. Brian Haynes

Journal:

Journal of Clinical Epidemiology

Year:

2008

Language:

english

File:

PDF, 127 KB

english, 2008

14

Few systematic reviews exist documenting the extent of bias: a systematic review

Andrea C. Tricco, Jennifer Tetzlaff, Margaret Sampson, Dean Fergusson, Elise Cogo, Tanya Horsley, David Moher

Journal:

Journal of Clinical Epidemiology

Year:

2008

Language:

english

File:

PDF, 311 KB

english, 2008

15

The account for provider and center effects in multicenter interventional and surgical randomized controlled trials is in need of improvement: a review

David J. Biau, Raphaël Porcher, Isabelle Boutron

Journal:

Journal of Clinical Epidemiology

Year:

2008

Language:

english

File:

PDF, 135 KB

english, 2008

16

Falsified papers in high-impact journals were slow to retract and indistinguishable from nonfraudulent papers

Nikolaos A. Trikalinos, Evangelos Evangelou, John P.A. Ioannidis

Journal:

Journal of Clinical Epidemiology

Year:

2008

Language:

english

File:

PDF, 164 KB

english, 2008

17

Why would physicians undervalue reviews by the Cochrane Collaboration?

Robert Badgett

Journal:

Journal of Clinical Epidemiology

Year:

2008

Language:

english

File:

PDF, 76 KB

english, 2008

18

Editorial Board

Journal:

Journal of Clinical Epidemiology

Year:

2008

Language:

english

File:

PDF, 25 KB

english, 2008

19

Volume 61; Issue 5

Oncology employees valued patient-oriented research over quality of work-life research: a qualitative study

Self-reported information on the diagnosis of colorectal cancer was reliable but not necessarily valid

A parametric analysis of ordinal quality-of-life data can lead to erroneous results

Tragedy of conducting a clinical trial; generic alert system needed

Poor reporting and inadequate searches were apparent in systematic reviews of adverse effects

Adjusted indirect comparison may be less biased than direct comparison for evaluating new pharmaceutical interventions

Lysholm scale and WOMAC index were responsive in prospective cohort of young general practice patients

Qualiveen, a urinary-disorder specific instrument: 0.5 corresponds to the minimal important difference

The Short-Form Chronic Respiratory Disease Questionnaire was a Valid, Reliable, and Responsive Quality-of-Life Instrument in Acute Exacerbations of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease

Comorbidity information in older patients at an emergency visit: self-report vs. administrative data had poor agreement but similar predictive validity

Studying the causes of adverse drug reactions: circumvent the warning-interfered bias using the case–case comparison approach

Maximization of the sum of sensitivity and specificity as a diagnostic cutpoint criterion

Systematic reviews and original articles differ in relevance, novelty, and use in an evidence-based service for physicians: PLUS project

Few systematic reviews exist documenting the extent of bias: a systematic review

The account for provider and center effects in multicenter interventional and surgical randomized controlled trials is in need of improvement: a review

Falsified papers in high-impact journals were slow to retract and indistinguishable from nonfraudulent papers

Why would physicians undervalue reviews by the Cochrane Collaboration?

Editorial Board

Table of Contents