Journal of Clinical Epidemiology

1

Electronic reminders did not improve postal questionnaire response rates or response times: a randomized controlled trial

Mei-See Man, Helen E. Tilbrook, Shalmini Jayakody, Catherine E. Hewitt, Helen Cox, Ben Cross, David J. Torgerson

Journal:

Year:

2011

Language:

english

File:

PDF, 233 KB

english, 2011

2

Mixed treatment comparison meta-analysis of altered fractionated radiotherapy and chemotherapy in head and neck cancer

Pierre Blanchard, Catherine Hill, Chantal Guihenneuc-Jouyaux, Charlotte Baey, Jean Bourhis, Jean Pierre Pignon

Journal:

Journal of Clinical Epidemiology

Year:

2011

Language:

english

File:

PDF, 156 KB

english, 2011

3

Performance of logistic regression modeling: beyond the number of events per variable, the role of data structure

Delphine S. Courvoisier, Christophe Combescure, Thomas Agoritsas, Angèle Gayet-Ageron, Thomas V. Perneger

Journal:

Journal of Clinical Epidemiology

Year:

2011

Language:

english

File:

PDF, 1.10 MB

english, 2011

4

The AUSCAN subscales, AIMS-2 hand/finger subscale, and FIOHA were not unidimensional scales

Ida Kristin Haugen, Rikke Helene Moe, Barbara Slatkowsky-Christensen, Tore Kristian Kvien, Désirée van der Heijde, Andrew Garratt

Journal:

Journal of Clinical Epidemiology

Year:

2011

Language:

english

File:

PDF, 209 KB

english, 2011

5

Full-scale scores of the Mini Mental State Examination can be generated from an abbreviated version

Fiona E. Matthews, Blossom C.M. Stephan, Kay-Tee Khaw, Shabina Hayat, Robert Luben, Amit Bhaniani, Stephanie Moore, Carol Brayne

Journal:

Journal of Clinical Epidemiology

Year:

2011

Language:

english

File:

PDF, 150 KB

english, 2011

6

Hospital discharge data can be used for monitoring procedures and intensive care related to severe maternal morbidity

Anne A. Chantry, Catherine Deneux-Tharaux, Christine Cans, Anne Ego, Catherine Quantin, Marie-Hélène Bouvier-Colle

Journal:

Journal of Clinical Epidemiology

Year:

2011

Language:

english

File:

PDF, 405 KB

english, 2011

7

A critical review of methods for the assessment of patient-level interactions in individual participant data meta-analysis of randomized trials, and guidance for practitioners

D.J. Fisher, A.J. Copas, J.F. Tierney, M.K.B. Parmar

Journal:

Journal of Clinical Epidemiology

Year:

2011

Language:

english

File:

PDF, 319 KB

english, 2011

8

Decisions to update comparative drug effectiveness reviews vary based on type of new evidence

Kim Peterson, Marian S. McDonagh, Rongwei Fu

Journal:

Journal of Clinical Epidemiology

Year:

2011

Language:

english

File:

PDF, 166 KB

english, 2011

9

Systematic review of stepped wedge cluster randomized trials shows that design is particularly used to evaluate interventions during routine implementation

Noreen D. Mdege, Mei-See Man, Celia A. Taylor (nee Brown), David J. Torgerson

Journal:

Journal of Clinical Epidemiology

Year:

2011

Language:

english

File:

PDF, 216 KB

english, 2011

10

Quality varies across clinical practice guidelines for mammography screening in women aged 40–49 years as assessed by AGREE and AMSTAR instruments

Brittany U. Burda, Susan L. Norris, Haley K. Holmer, Lauren A. Ogden, M.E. Beth Smith

Journal:

Journal of Clinical Epidemiology

Year:

2011

Language:

english

File:

PDF, 376 KB

english, 2011

11

Outcomes assessment in the SPRINT multicenter tibial fracture trial: Adjudication committee size has trivial effect on trial results

Journal:

Journal of Clinical Epidemiology

Year:

2011

Language:

english

File:

PDF, 227 KB

english, 2011

12

Reporting of noninferiority trials was incomplete in trial registries

Olaf M. Dekkers, Darius Soonawala, Jan P. Vandenbroucke, Matthias Egger

Journal:

Journal of Clinical Epidemiology

Year:

2011

Language:

english

File:

PDF, 128 KB

english, 2011

13

P-values are misunderstood, but do not confound

Richard Hooper

Journal:

Journal of Clinical Epidemiology

Year:

2011

Language:

english

File:

PDF, 56 KB

english, 2011

14

That confounded P-value revisited

Andreas Stang, Kenneth J. Rothman

Journal:

Journal of Clinical Epidemiology

Year:

2011

Language:

english

File:

PDF, 63 KB

english, 2011

15

Erratum to “The limits of agreement and the intraclass correlation coefficient may be inconsistent in the interpretation of agreement” [J Clin Epidemiol 2011;64:264–9]

Cristina Costa-Santos, João Bernardes, Diogo Ayres-de-Campos, Antónia Costa, Célia Amorim-Costa

Journal:

Journal of Clinical Epidemiology

Year:

2011

File:

PDF, 45 KB

2011

16

Erratum to “Reported effects in randomized controlled trials were compared with those of nonrandomized trials in cholecystectomy” [J Clin Epidemiol 2010;63:1082–90]

Dirk Müller, Stefan Sauerland, Edmund A.M. Neugebauer, Marc Immenroth

Journal:

Journal of Clinical Epidemiology

Year:

2011

File:

PDF, 44 KB

2011

17

Updating systematic reviews – when and how?

Peter Tugwell, Andre Knottnerus, Leanne Idzerda

Journal:

Journal of Clinical Epidemiology

Year:

2011

Language:

english

File:

PDF, 65 KB

english, 2011

18

Editorial Board

Journal:

Journal of Clinical Epidemiology

Year:

2011

Language:

english

File:

PDF, 43 KB

english, 2011

19

Volume 64; Issue 9

Electronic reminders did not improve postal questionnaire response rates or response times: a randomized controlled trial

Mixed treatment comparison meta-analysis of altered fractionated radiotherapy and chemotherapy in head and neck cancer

Performance of logistic regression modeling: beyond the number of events per variable, the role of data structure

The AUSCAN subscales, AIMS-2 hand/finger subscale, and FIOHA were not unidimensional scales

Full-scale scores of the Mini Mental State Examination can be generated from an abbreviated version

Hospital discharge data can be used for monitoring procedures and intensive care related to severe maternal morbidity

A critical review of methods for the assessment of patient-level interactions in individual participant data meta-analysis of randomized trials, and guidance for practitioners

Decisions to update comparative drug effectiveness reviews vary based on type of new evidence

Systematic review of stepped wedge cluster randomized trials shows that design is particularly used to evaluate interventions during routine implementation

Quality varies across clinical practice guidelines for mammography screening in women aged 40–49 years as assessed by AGREE and AMSTAR instruments

Outcomes assessment in the SPRINT multicenter tibial fracture trial: Adjudication committee size has trivial effect on trial results

Reporting of noninferiority trials was incomplete in trial registries

P-values are misunderstood, but do not confound

That confounded P-value revisited

Erratum to “The limits of agreement and the intraclass correlation coefficient may be inconsistent in the interpretation of agreement” [J Clin Epidemiol 2011;64:264–9]

Erratum to “Reported effects in randomized controlled trials were compared with those of nonrandomized trials in cholecystectomy” [J Clin Epidemiol 2010;63:1082–90]

Updating systematic reviews – when and how?

Editorial Board

Table of Contents