Journal of Clinical Epidemiology

1

Systematic reviews examining implementation of research into practice and impact on population health are needed

Yoong, Sze Lin, Clinton-McHarg, Tara, Wolfenden, Luke

Journal:

Year:

2015

Language:

english

File:

PDF, 407 KB

english, 2015

2

Authors report lack of time as main reason for unpublished research presented at biomedical conferences: a systematic review

Scherer, Roberta W., Ugarte-Gil, Cesar, Schmucker, Christine, Meerpohl, Joerg J.

Journal:

Journal of Clinical Epidemiology

Year:

2015

Language:

english

File:

PDF, 3.25 MB

english, 2015

3

Statistical testing against baseline was common in dental research

Koletsi, Despina, Madahar, Arun, Fleming, Padhraig S., Pandis, Nikolaos

Journal:

Journal of Clinical Epidemiology

Year:

2015

Language:

english

File:

PDF, 289 KB

english, 2015

4

Validation and impact analysis of prognostic clinical prediction rules for low back pain is needed: a systematic review

Haskins, Robin, Osmotherly, Peter G., Rivett, Darren A.

Journal:

Journal of Clinical Epidemiology

Year:

2015

Language:

english

File:

PDF, 596 KB

english, 2015

5

Meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials show suboptimal validity of surrogate outcomes for overall survival in advanced colorectal cancer

Ciani, Oriana, Buyse, Marc, Garside, Ruth, Peters, Jaime, Saad, Everardo D., Stein, Ken, Taylor, Rod S.

Journal:

Journal of Clinical Epidemiology

Year:

2015

Language:

english

File:

PDF, 452 KB

english, 2015

6

Quality of evidence is a key determinant for making a strong GRADE guidelines recommendation

Djulbegovic, Benjamin, Kumar, Ambuj, Kaufman, Richard M., Tobian, Aaron, Guyatt, Gordon H.

Journal:

Journal of Clinical Epidemiology

Year:

2015

Language:

english

File:

PDF, 240 KB

english, 2015

7

Head-to-head randomized trials are mostly industry sponsored and almost always favor the industry sponsor

Flacco, Maria Elena, Manzoli, Lamberto, Boccia, Stefania, Capasso, Lorenzo, Aleksovska, Katina, Rosso, Annalisa, Scaioli, Giacomo, De Vito, Corrado, Siliquini, Roberta, Villari, Paolo, Ioannidis, John

Journal:

Journal of Clinical Epidemiology

Year:

2015

Language:

english

File:

PDF, 475 KB

english, 2015

8

Propensity score matching and randomization

Mnatzaganian, George, Davidson, David C., Hiller, Janet E., Ryan, Philip

Journal:

Journal of Clinical Epidemiology

Year:

2015

Language:

english

File:

PDF, 516 KB

english, 2015

9

The special case of the 2 × 2 table: asymptotic unconditional McNemar test can be used to estimate sample size even for analysis based on GEE

Borkhoff, Cornelia M., Johnston, Patrick R., Stephens, Derek, Atenafu, Eshetu

Journal:

Journal of Clinical Epidemiology

Year:

2015

Language:

english

File:

PDF, 212 KB

english, 2015

10

Inadequate use and regulation of interventions against publication bias decreases their effectiveness: a systematic review

Thaler, Kylie, Kien, Christina, Nussbaumer, Barbara, Van Noord, Megan G., Griebler, Ursula, Klerings, Irma, Gartlehner, Gerald

Journal:

Journal of Clinical Epidemiology

Year:

2015

Language:

english

File:

PDF, 768 KB

english, 2015

11

In a clinimetric analysis, 3D stereophotogrammetry was found to be reliable and valid for measuring scar volume in clinical research

Stekelenburg, Carlijn M., Jaspers, Mariëlle E.H., Niessen, Frank B., Knol, Dirk L., van der Wal, Martijn B.A., de Vet, Henrica C.W., van Zuijlen, Paul P.M.

Journal:

Journal of Clinical Epidemiology

Year:

2015

Language:

english

File:

PDF, 724 KB

english, 2015

12

Odds ratios of treatment response were well approximated from continuous rating scale scores for meta-analysis

Meister, Ramona, von Wolff, Alessa, Kriston, Levente

Journal:

Journal of Clinical Epidemiology

Year:

2015

Language:

english

File:

PDF, 1.61 MB

english, 2015

13

Lottery ticket was more effective than a prize draw in increasing questionnaire response among cancer survivors

Drummond, Frances J., O'Leary, Eamonn, Sharp, Linda

Journal:

Journal of Clinical Epidemiology

Year:

2015

Language:

english

File:

PDF, 474 KB

english, 2015

14

An enhancement of ROC curves made them clinically relevant for diagnostic-test comparison and optimal-threshold determination

Subtil, Fabien, Rabilloud, Muriel

Journal:

Journal of Clinical Epidemiology

Year:

2015

Language:

english

File:

PDF, 403 KB

english, 2015

15

Correction to ‘Inter-population differences in measuring: appreciation by adaptation’ [J Clin Epidemiol 2015;68(4):357-359]

Knottnerus, J. André, Tugwell, Peter

Journal:

Journal of Clinical Epidemiology

Year:

2015

Language:

english

File:

PDF, 86 KB

english, 2015

16

The new paradigm: from ‘bench to bedside’ to the translational research ‘valleys of death’

Tugwell, Peter, Knottnerus, J. André

Journal:

Journal of Clinical Epidemiology

Year:

2015

Language:

english

File:

PDF, 110 KB

english, 2015

17

Editorial Board

Journal:

Journal of Clinical Epidemiology

Year:

2015

Language:

english

File:

PDF, 57 KB

english, 2015

Volume 68; Issue 7

Systematic reviews examining implementation of research into practice and impact on population health are needed

Authors report lack of time as main reason for unpublished research presented at biomedical conferences: a systematic review

Statistical testing against baseline was common in dental research

Validation and impact analysis of prognostic clinical prediction rules for low back pain is needed: a systematic review

Meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials show suboptimal validity of surrogate outcomes for overall survival in advanced colorectal cancer

Quality of evidence is a key determinant for making a strong GRADE guidelines recommendation

Head-to-head randomized trials are mostly industry sponsored and almost always favor the industry sponsor

Propensity score matching and randomization

The special case of the 2 × 2 table: asymptotic unconditional McNemar test can be used to estimate sample size even for analysis based on GEE

Inadequate use and regulation of interventions against publication bias decreases their effectiveness: a systematic review

In a clinimetric analysis, 3D stereophotogrammetry was found to be reliable and valid for measuring scar volume in clinical research

Odds ratios of treatment response were well approximated from continuous rating scale scores for meta-analysis

Lottery ticket was more effective than a prize draw in increasing questionnaire response among cancer survivors

An enhancement of ROC curves made them clinically relevant for diagnostic-test comparison and optimal-threshold determination

Correction to ‘Inter-population differences in measuring: appreciation by adaptation’ [J Clin Epidemiol 2015;68(4):357-359]

The new paradigm: from ‘bench to bedside’ to the translational research ‘valleys of death’

Table of Contents

Editorial Board